The introduction of "Search Generative Experience" (SGE) systems at Google and the rise of answer engines like Perplexity or ChatGPT Search mark a technological breakthrough in search. Unlike traditional search engines based on indexing and link graphs (PageRank), generative engines rely on the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) architecture and NLP (see SEO vs LLM SEO).
In this context, an entity's reputation is no longer just a trust signal for the user, but a vector weighting parameter for the algorithm.
This article details, with technical evidence, how sentiment in textual data influences the probability of citation by an AI.
1. RAG Mechanism and Polarity Filtering
Most current answer engines use RAG to minimize hallucinations. This process occurs in three stages:
- Retrieval: Search for relevant documents in the vector index.
- Augmentation: Injection of these documents into the LLM context.
- Generation: Synthesis of the final answer.
The Polarity Factor (Sentiment Scoring)
During the vectorization stage, modern NLP algorithms (such as BERT) analyze the polarity of the context surrounding a Named Entity (your brand).
Technical fact: A document containing terms with strong negative polarity (e.g., scam, flaw, disappointment, slow) places the entity in a "toxic" semantic cluster.
RAG Consequence: When generating a response to a comparative query (e.g., "Best CRM solution"), the model applies a safety filter. To align the response with "Helpfulness" and "Safety" principles, the model tends to statistically exclude entities associated with negative clusters, or cite them with explicit warnings.
2. "Ground Truth" and the Google-Reddit Agreement
To assess information reliability, LLMs rely on data sources considered as "Ground Truth".
The Factual Importance of Reddit
In February 2024, Google formalized a $60 million per year agreement to access Reddit's real-time data API. Why? Reddit discussions provide a density of unfiltered human opinions (UGC) essential for model training and fact validation.
GEO Impact: A brand heavily criticized on thematic "Subreddits" will see its Trust Score drop in Google's Knowledge Graph, directly affecting its visibility in AI Overviews (AIO).
3. Sentiment Analysis: Metrics and Visualization
AI doesn't just use the average rating (Star Rating). It practices ABSA (Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis). It breaks down sentiment by attribute (Price, Support, Reliability). It's therefore crucial to visualize your reputation not as a single score, but as a vector heatmap.
Competitive Landscape Analysis
Relative positioning by Volume and Sentiment
Niche
(Loved / Low Vol)
Leader
(High Vol / Sent)
Risk
(Viral / Negative)
Brand A (Cult Favorite)
Brand B (Market Leader)
Brand D (Legacy Low Buzz)
Brand C (Controversial)
Brand E (Viral Risk)
This chart cross-references conversation volume (X-Axis) with sentiment quality (Y-Axis). Bubble size represents AI Visibility. Note how "Brand C" (red) has high volume but negative sentiment, which hurts its recommendation by algorithms.
Analysis: This visualization represents semantic clusters. A brand can have an overall "Neutral" sentiment, but a bright red cluster on the "Security" attribute.
In the factual case above, AI will exclude this brand from any query including the term "secure" or "reliable". This is a fundamental principle of GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).
4. Citation as Validation Vote (RLHF)
Unlike hyperlinks that transfer authority (Link Juice), citation in a generative answer is the result of an RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) process.
- During training: humans rate the answers. They penalize answers recommending controversial products.
- Consensus bias: To maximize its reward function, the model learns to favor entities with positive consensus.
- Automatic downgrading: If training data associates an entity with risk terms, the model will learn not to predict this entity as the logical continuation of a recommendation query.
Probabilité de Citation vs Sentiment
Corrélation entre le sentiment analysé et la probabilité d'être cité par un LLM
5. Technical Strategy: Cleaning the Semantic Aura
Sentiment optimization in GEO relies on modifying weights in the vector space.
A. Contradictory Content Injection
LLMs are sensitive to data frequency and recency. To counter historical negative sentiment:
- Volume: You must generate a volume of positive factual content greater than the negative volume to shift the sentiment vector's center of gravity.
- Authority Sources: Publishing on high-authority domains (Trustpilot, G2, news sites) carries more weight in the calculation.
B. Review Structuring (Schema.org)
To facilitate algorithm reading:
- Use JSON-LD Review and AggregateRating markup.
- Encourage detailed reviews. A review containing "Customer service resolved my API bug in 2 hours" is positive structured data for the "Support" attribute. A "Great" review is statistical noise.
Conclusion
In the GEO era, e-reputation is no longer a "soft" marketing metric, but a "hard" algorithm variable. Sentiment detected in training corpora (Reddit, Forums, Reviews) acts as a pass-fail filter for generative answer eligibility. Brands must now audit their semantic clusters with the same rigor they audit their technical code.
