AI VISIBILITY SNAPSHOT
C-MonEtiquette
c-monetiquette.fr·Gifts & Personalization
Audited on February 18, 2026. Scores change weekly as LLMs update their training sources.
GLOBAL SCORE
8
/100
INVISIBLE
AT RISKKey Metrics
Presence in AI responses.
CITED IN RESPONSE
0/3
CITED IN PROMPT
1/3
TOP #1
0/3
PROMPTS
3
AI Ranking
Who AI mentions first — and who is rising.
| Prompt | Engine | Position | Competitors |
|---|---|---|---|
| I'm looking for independent custom labels for products brands in France. What are the best options for quality custom adhesive labels? I don't want big corporations, rather local independent brands.PURCHASE | Not cited | ||
| How do I choose among independent custom labels for products brands in France? What criteria should I look for when buying custom adhesive labels?COMPARISON | Not cited | ||
| What are the best independent alternatives to C-MonEtiquette for custom labels for products? I want similar-sized local brands in France, not large corporations.ALTERNATIVES | Not cited |
NEXT STEP
You're missing 95% of insights on C-MonEtiquette.
The full audit of c-monetiquette.fr tests 60 queries across 3 AI engines, detects every weak spot, and generates a personalized action plan.
AI VISIBILITY ANALYSIS
C-MonEtiquette achieves an AI visibility score of 8/100 in the Gifts & Personalization category. The brand remains undervisible in AI-generated responses, representing an optimization opportunity through GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).
In terms of share of voice, C-MonEtiquette competes against Labelys, Etiqroll and Etiquettes Express. No brand clearly dominates #1 positions on these prompts — an opportunity to differentiate through GEO.
To improve AI visibility, brands should optimize their presence on sources that LLMs consult: structured data (Schema.org), customer reviews, expert content, and media mentions. See our methodology to understand visibility score calculations.
C-MonEtiquette