AI VISIBILITY SNAPSHOT
Field and Fish
fieldandfish.com·Food & Gastronomy
Audited on February 18, 2026. Scores change weekly as LLMs update their training sources.
GLOBAL SCORE
8
/100
INVISIBLE
AT RISKKey Metrics
Presence in AI responses.
CITED IN RESPONSE
0/3
CITED IN PROMPT
1/3
TOP #1
0/3
PROMPTS
3
AI Ranking
Who AI mentions first — and who is rising.
| Prompt | Engine | Position | Competitors |
|---|---|---|---|
| I'm looking for eco-friendly sustainable and local seafood products brands in France. What are the best options for quality fresh fish and seafood? I don't want big corporations, rather local independent brands.PURCHASE | Not cited | ||
| How do I choose among independent sustainable and local seafood products brands in France? What criteria should I look for when buying fresh fish and seafood?COMPARISON | Not cited | ||
| What are the best independent alternatives to Field and Fish for sustainable and local seafood products? I want similar-sized local brands in France, not large corporations.ALTERNATIVES | Not cited |
NEXT STEP
You're missing 95% of insights on Field and Fish.
The full audit of fieldandfish.com tests 60 queries across 3 AI engines, detects every weak spot, and generates a personalized action plan.
AI VISIBILITY ANALYSIS
Field and Fish achieves an AI visibility score of 8/100 in the Food & Gastronomy category. The brand remains undervisible in AI-generated responses, representing an optimization opportunity through GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).
In terms of share of voice, Field and Fish competes against Poiscaille, La Criée d'à Côté and Les Viviers de Noirmoutier. Poiscaille currently dominates #1 placements (3 vs 0 for Field and Fish).
To improve AI visibility, brands should optimize their presence on sources that LLMs consult: structured data (Schema.org), customer reviews, expert content, and media mentions. See our methodology to understand visibility score calculations.
Field and Fish