AI VISIBILITY SNAPSHOT
GenoPalate
genopalate.com·Health Technology
Audited on February 17, 2026. Scores change weekly as LLMs update their training sources.
GLOBAL SCORE
8
/100
INVISIBLE
AT RISKKey Metrics
Presence in AI responses.
CITED IN RESPONSE
0/3
CITED IN PROMPT
1/3
TOP #1
0/3
PROMPTS
3
AI Ranking
Who AI mentions first — and who is rising.
| Prompt | Engine | Position | Competitors |
|---|---|---|---|
| I'm looking for the best health technology brands in the United States. What do health professionals and consumers recommend for high-quality Personalized nutrition based on genetic testing?PURCHASE | Not cited | ||
| How do I choose the best health technology in the United States? What should I look for in terms of quality, certifications, third-party testing, and ingredient sourcing?COMPARISON | Not cited | ||
| What are the best alternatives to GenoPalate for health technology? I want similar quality brands with transparent ingredients, available in the United States.ALTERNATIVES | Not cited |
NEXT STEP
You're missing 95% of insights on GenoPalate.
The full audit of genopalate.com tests 60 queries across 3 AI engines, detects every weak spot, and generates a personalized action plan.
AI VISIBILITY ANALYSIS
GenoPalate achieves an AI visibility score of 8/100 in the Health Technology category. The brand remains undervisible in AI-generated responses, representing an optimization opportunity through GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).
In terms of share of voice, GenoPalate competes against 23andMe, Thorne Research and Nutrigenomix. 23andMe currently dominates #1 placements (2 vs 0 for GenoPalate).
To improve AI visibility, brands should optimize their presence on sources that LLMs consult: structured data (Schema.org), customer reviews, expert content, and media mentions. See our methodology to understand visibility score calculations.
GenoPalate