AI VISIBILITY SNAPSHOT
LOOKING FOR WILD
lookingforwild.com·Fashion & Clothing
Audited on February 18, 2026. Scores change weekly as LLMs update their training sources.
GLOBAL SCORE
8
/100
INVISIBLE
AT RISKKey Metrics
Presence in AI responses.
CITED IN RESPONSE
0/3
CITED IN PROMPT
1/3
TOP #1
0/3
PROMPTS
3
AI Ranking
Who AI mentions first — and who is rising.
| Prompt | Engine | Position | Competitors |
|---|---|---|---|
| I'm looking for eco-friendly eco-friendly outdoor clothing brands in France. What are the best options for quality clothing and accessories for adventurers? I don't want big corporations, rather local independent brands.PURCHASE | Not cited | ||
| How do I choose among independent eco-friendly outdoor clothing brands in France? What criteria should I look for when buying clothing and accessories for adventurers?COMPARISON | Not cited | ||
| What are the best independent alternatives to LOOKING FOR WILD for eco-friendly outdoor clothing? I want similar-sized local brands in France, not large corporations.ALTERNATIVES | Not cited |
NEXT STEP
You're missing 95% of insights on LOOKING FOR WILD.
The full audit of lookingforwild.com tests 60 queries across 3 AI engines, detects every weak spot, and generates a personalized action plan.
AI VISIBILITY ANALYSIS
LOOKING FOR WILD achieves an AI visibility score of 8/100 in the Fashion & Clothing category. The brand remains undervisible in AI-generated responses, representing an optimization opportunity through GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).
In terms of share of voice, LOOKING FOR WILD competes against Picture Organic Clothing, Hopaal and 1083. Picture Organic Clothing currently dominates #1 placements (3 vs 0 for LOOKING FOR WILD).
To improve AI visibility, brands should optimize their presence on sources that LLMs consult: structured data (Schema.org), customer reviews, expert content, and media mentions. See our methodology to understand visibility score calculations.
LOOKING FOR WILD