AI VISIBILITY SNAPSHOT
NBO3 Technologies
nbo3.com·Health Technology
Audited on February 17, 2026. Scores change weekly as LLMs update their training sources.
GLOBAL SCORE
8
/100
INVISIBLE
AT RISKKey Metrics
Presence in AI responses.
CITED IN RESPONSE
0/3
CITED IN PROMPT
1/3
TOP #1
0/3
PROMPTS
3
AI Ranking
Who AI mentions first — and who is rising.
| Prompt | Engine | Position | Competitors |
|---|---|---|---|
| I'm looking for the best health technology brands in the United States. What do health professionals and consumers recommend for high-quality Nutritional technology solutions?PURCHASE | Not cited | ||
| How do I choose the best health technology in the United States? What should I look for in terms of quality, certifications, third-party testing, and ingredient sourcing?COMPARISON | Not cited | ||
| What are the best alternatives to NBO3 Technologies for health technology? I want similar quality brands with transparent ingredients, available in the United States.ALTERNATIVES | Not cited |
NEXT STEP
You're missing 95% of insights on NBO3 Technologies.
The full audit of nbo3.com tests 60 queries across 3 AI engines, detects every weak spot, and generates a personalized action plan.
AI VISIBILITY ANALYSIS
NBO3 Technologies achieves an AI visibility score of 8/100 in the Health Technology category. The brand remains undervisible in AI-generated responses, representing an optimization opportunity through GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).
In terms of share of voice, NBO3 Technologies competes against Thorne Research, Garden of Life and Pure Encapsulations. Thorne Research currently dominates #1 placements (3 vs 0 for NBO3 Technologies).
To improve AI visibility, brands should optimize their presence on sources that LLMs consult: structured data (Schema.org), customer reviews, expert content, and media mentions. See our methodology to understand visibility score calculations.
NBO3 Technologies