AI VISIBILITY SNAPSHOT
Quicksilver Scientific
quicksilverscientific.com·Wellness & Adaptogens
Audited on February 17, 2026. Scores change weekly as LLMs update their training sources.
GLOBAL SCORE
8
/100
INVISIBLE
AT RISKKey Metrics
Presence in AI responses.
CITED IN RESPONSE
0/3
CITED IN PROMPT
1/3
TOP #1
0/3
PROMPTS
3
AI Ranking
Who AI mentions first — and who is rising.
| Prompt | Engine | Position | Competitors |
|---|---|---|---|
| I'm looking for the best wellness & adaptogens brands in the United States. What do health professionals and consumers recommend for high-quality Nutritional supplements and wellness products?PURCHASE | Not cited | ||
| How do I choose the best wellness & adaptogens in the United States? What should I look for in terms of quality, certifications, third-party testing, and ingredient sourcing?COMPARISON | Not cited | ||
| What are the best alternatives to Quicksilver Scientific for wellness & adaptogens? I want similar quality brands with transparent ingredients, available in the United States.ALTERNATIVES | Not cited |
NEXT STEP
You're missing 95% of insights on Quicksilver Scientific.
The full audit of quicksilverscientific.com tests 60 queries across 3 AI engines, detects every weak spot, and generates a personalized action plan.
AI VISIBILITY ANALYSIS
Quicksilver Scientific achieves an AI visibility score of 8/100 in the Wellness & Adaptogens category. The brand remains undervisible in AI-generated responses, representing an optimization opportunity through GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).
In terms of share of voice, Quicksilver Scientific competes against Gaia Herbs, Thorne and Four Sigmatic. No brand clearly dominates #1 positions on these prompts — an opportunity to differentiate through GEO.
To improve AI visibility, brands should optimize their presence on sources that LLMs consult: structured data (Schema.org), customer reviews, expert content, and media mentions. See our methodology to understand visibility score calculations.
Quicksilver Scientific